Naoki Nakagawa vs Mark Whitehouse Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Sep at 01:27 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Nakagawa vs M. Whitehouse

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nakagawa 1 - 0 Whitehouse
They have played 2 sets in total, with Naoki Nakagawa winning 2 and Mark Whitehouse winning 0. The last match between Naoki Nakagawa and Mark Whitehouse was at the M25 Sapporo, 12-09-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Naoki Nakagawa getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nakagawa | 1 |
| Whitehouse | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Sapporo(09-12-25)
N. Nakagawa vs M. Whitehouse H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.57% (333-226) | Career Total W/L | 50.37% (202-199) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Nakagawa vs M. Whitehouse Match Preview:
- Nakagawa is slightly stronger on second serve performance, with a win rate of 47.54% compared to Whitehouse's 44.44%. Could this give Nakagawa a slight edge in service games?
- When it comes to return games, Whitehouse has the upper hand, winning 47.33% of second serve return points compared to Nakagawa's 41.73%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Whitehouse again outperforms Nakagawa, winning 26.32% versus 22.31%.
- Both players perform relatively well under pressure, with Whitehouse slightly better at saving breakpoints (55.05% vs. 53.85%).
- Whitehouse has a higher overall win percentage in matches over the last year, winning 62.07% compared to Nakagawa's 50%.
- Nakagawa has the best career win percentage on Indoor Hard courts, whereas Whitehouse performs best on Hard courts but lags behind on Clay.
- Whitehouse has been more successful in lower-level tournaments recently, indicating potential consistency at this level with a win rate of 68%.
- Nakagawa has faced stronger opponents on average, with an average opponent rank of 415.08 compared to Whitehouse's 247.1.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Nakagawa shows a higher win rate at 55%, which could be crucial in a closely contested match.
- Whitehouse converts break point opportunities more effectively at 38.3% compared to Nakagawa's 29.07%, a vital stat in critical moments.
Editorial Prediction (September 12, 2025, UTC):
This upcoming match presents an intriguing battle of contrasting strengths and recent performances.
While Whitehouse excels in return games and possesses a higher breakpoint conversion rate, he also demonstrates the resilience needed in high-pressure scenarios, which could prove pivotal.
Although Nakagawa has faced tougher opponents and performs slightly better in deciding sets, Whitehouse's overall higher win rate and performance in the Futures circuit suggest a strong likelihood for success at this event level.
Taking into consideration recent form and key statistics, Whitehouse is the predicted favorite to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Naoki Nakagawa vs Mark Whitehouse Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Nakagawa vs M. Whitehouse H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:29:15 | Average Match Time | 1:29:15 |
| 48% (29/60) | 1st Serve % | 53% (30/57) |
| 76% (22/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (21/30) |
| 71% (22/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (14/27) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 39% (22/57) | Return Points Win % | 27% (16/60) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Nakagawa Recent Matches Played
M. Whitehouse Recent Matches Played

N. Nakagawa vs M. Whitehouse Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.57% (333/226) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.37% (202/199) |
| 57.10% (744/559) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.65% (466/454) |
| 52.23% (6479/5925) | Games Win/Loss | 50.60% (4457/4351) |
| 59.29% (201/138) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.88% (124/115) |
| 59.89% (112/75) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.34% (19/22) |
| 60.61% (20/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 49.44% (44/45) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 1960 | Aces Total | 1557 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1126 | Total Double Faults | 767 |
| 1:20:35 | Average Match Time | 1:9:19 |
| 467.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 450.53 |
| 57% (16663/29326) | 1st Serve % | 65% (13640/21052) |
| 69% (11579/16663) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9333/13640) |
| 50% (6366/12663) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3513/7412) |
| 42% (1207/2872) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (814/1984) |
| 39% (11574/29435) | Return Points Win % | 39% (8078/20892) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 44.30% (66/83) | Challenger W/L | 41.03% (16/23) |
| 65.60% (267/140) | Futures W/L | 51.67% (186/174) |
| 59% (329/553) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (201/398) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (99/177) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (58/123) |
| 57% (106/185) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (58/121) |
| 87% (306/267) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (210/171) |
| 13% (306/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (210/37) |
| 26% (253/66) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (191/31) |